3. Let
be a linear map and
a subspace. Show that:
is a subspace of
.
Proof: Suppose
. Then
. But
is a subspace and so
. But
is linear so that
so that
. Thus,
is closed under vector addition. Now suppose
and
. Then
and since
is a subspace,
. But again
is linear so
. This means
. Hence
is closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore
is a subspace of
.
10. Show that if
and
are subspaces, then
is also a subspace.
Proof: Suppose
. Then
and
. But
is a subspace and so
. Also
is a subspace so
. This means
. On the other hand
. Thus,
is closed under vector addition. Now suppose
and
. Then
and
. But
and
are subspaces so
and
. That means
. This means
. Hence
is closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore
is a subspace of
.
12. Let
be a linear map and consider the graph
(a) Show that
is a subspace.
Proof: Suppose
. Then
. Here I used the fact that
is linear which means
. Thus,
is closed under vector addition. Now suppose
and
. Then
. Again I used the linearity property to conclude
. Hence
is closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore
is a subspace of
.
(b) Show that the map
that sends
to
is an isomorphism.
Proof: Call this map
. That is
. First I will show this map is linear:
and
. Thus
is linear. Now to show
is bijective. If
, then
so
is trivially onto. In fact, we essentially chose to the codomain of our function
to just be the image/range of the map to ensure it was onto. Now to show
is one-to-one. Suppose
. Then
. But two ordered pairs are equal if and only if both components are equal. That is,
. Thus
is one-to-one. Therefore
is an isomorphism.