Difference between revisions of "009B Sample Final 1, Problem 1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kayla Murray (talk | contribs) |
Kayla Murray (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
|Thus, the lower Riemann sum is | |Thus, the lower Riemann sum is | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |<math>2(f(-3)+f(-1)+f( | + | |<math>2(f(-3)+f(-1)+f(3))=2(0+16+0)=32</math>. |
|} | |} | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|Thus, the upper Riemann sum is | |Thus, the upper Riemann sum is | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |<math>2(f(-1)+f(1)+f( | + | |<math>2(f(-1)+f(-1)+f(1))=2(16+16+16)=96</math> |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 17:03, 22 February 2016
Consider the region bounded by the following two functions:
- and
a) Using the lower sum with three rectangles having equal width , approximate the area.
b) Using the upper sum with three rectangles having equal width, approximate the area.
c) Find the actual area of the region.
Foundations: |
---|
Link to Riemann sums page |
Solution:
(a)
Step 1: |
---|
We need to set these two equations equal in order to find the intersection points of these functions. |
So, we let . Solving for , we get . |
This means that we need to calculate the Riemann sums over the interval . |
Step 2: |
---|
Since the length of our interval is and we are using rectangles, |
each rectangle will have width . |
Thus, the lower Riemann sum is |
. |
(b)
Step 1: |
---|
As in Part (a), the length of our inteval is and |
each rectangle will have width . (See Step 1 and 2 for part (a)) |
Step 2: |
---|
Thus, the upper Riemann sum is |
(c)
Step 1: |
---|
To find the actual area of the region, we need to calculate |
Step 2: |
---|
We integrate to get |
|
Final Answer: |
---|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |