|
|
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | | |
| '''16.''' Show that the matrix<br /> | | '''16.''' Show that the matrix<br /> |
− | <math>\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix</math> | + | <math>\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}</math> |
| as a linear map satisfies <math>\ker(L) = \text{im}(L)</math>.<br /> | | as a linear map satisfies <math>\ker(L) = \text{im}(L)</math>.<br /> |
| <br /> | | <br /> |
Revision as of 16:34, 12 November 2015
7. Show that two 2-dimensional subspaces of a 3-dimensional subspace must have nontrivial intersection.
Proof: (by contradiction) Suppose
are both 2-dimensional subspaces of a 3-dimension vector space
and assume that
have trivial intersection. Then
is also a subspace of
, and since
have a trivial intersection
. But then:
. However subspaces must have a smaller dimension than the whole vector space and
. This is a contradiction and so
must have trivial intersection.
8. Let
be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space
. Show that
.
Proof: Define the linear map
by
. Then by dimension formula
First note that in general
. This fact I won’t prove here but is why
. Now
. That is,
iff
. But since
and
and they are actually the same vector,
, then we must have
. That says that the elements of the kernel are ordered pairs where the first and second component are equal and must be in
. Then we can write
. I claim that this is isomorphic to
. To prove this consider the function
as
. This map
is an isomorphism which you can check. Since we have an isomorphism, the dimensions must equal and so
. Finally let us examine
. I claim that
. Note, this is equal and not just isomorphic. To see this, we note that if
then
by subspace property. So then any
is also equal to
. So these sets do indeed contain the exact same elements. That means
. Putting this all together gives:
.
8. Let
be subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space
. Show that
.
Proof: Define the linear map
by
. Then by dimension formula
First note that in general
. This fact I won’t prove here but is why
. Now
. That is,
iff
. But since
and
and they are actually the same vector,
, then we must have
. That says that the elements of the kernel are ordered pairs where the first and second component are equal and must be in
. Then we can write
. I claim that this is isomorphic to
. To prove this consider the function
as
. This map
is an isomorphism which you can check. Since we have an isomorphism, the dimensions must equal and so
. Finally let us examine
. I claim that
. Note, this is equal and not just isomorphic. To see this, we note that if
then
by subspace property. So then any
is also equal to
. So these sets do indeed contain the exact same elements. That means
. Putting this all together gives:
.
16. Show that the matrix
as a linear map satisfies
.
Proof: The matrix is already in eschelon form and has one pivot in the second column. That means that a basis for the column space which is the same as the image would be the second column. In other words,
. Now for the kernel space. Writing out the equation
reads
or in other words
. Then an arbitrary element of the kernel
. So again
. In other words,
.
17. Show that
defines a projection for all
. Compute the kernel and image.
First I will deal with the case
. In this case the matrix is
and we see by the procedure in the last problem that:
and
.
Now for the case
. Then we still have only one pivot and either column can form a basis for the image. Using the second column makes it look nicer, and is the same as the previous case.
. The difference is when we write out the equation
to find the kernel, we get
. With
as our free variable this means
so that a basis for the kernel is
.