Difference between revisions of "009B Sample Final 2, Problem 4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kayla Murray (talk | contribs) |
Kayla Murray (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span class="exam"> A city bordered on one side by a lake can be approximated by a semicircle of radius 7 miles, whose city center is on the shoreline. As we move away from the center along a radius the population density of the city can be approximated by: | <span class="exam"> A city bordered on one side by a lake can be approximated by a semicircle of radius 7 miles, whose city center is on the shoreline. As we move away from the center along a radius the population density of the city can be approximated by: | ||
| − | + | ::<math>\rho(x)=25000e^{-0.15x}</math> | |
<span class="exam">people per square mile. What is the population of the city? | <span class="exam">people per square mile. What is the population of the city? | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
!Foundations: | !Foundations: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Many word problems can be confusing, and this is a good example. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |We know that we are going to integrate over a half-disk of radius 7, but how do we construct the integral? |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |One key could be the expression of our density, |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | <math>\rho(x)=25,000e^{-0.15x}</math> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | { | ||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |where <math style="vertical-align: 0px">x</math> is the distance from the center. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Any slice along a radius gives us a cross section. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |If we were revolving ALL the way around the center, this would be typical solid of revolution, |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |and we could find the volume of revolving the center by the usual shell formula |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | <math>V\ =\ \int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}2\pi R\cdot h\,dx.</math> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |What changes, since we are only doing half of a disk? |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Also, this particular problem will require integration by parts: |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | <math>\int u\,dv=uv-\int v\,du.</math> |
|} | |} | ||
| − | ''' | + | |
| + | '''Solution:''' | ||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;" | {| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;" | ||
!Step 1: | !Step 1: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |We can treat this as a solid of revolution, and use the shell method. |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |We are working on a half disk of radius 7, so we can integrate a cross-section where <math style="vertical-align: 0px">x</math> goes from 0 to 7 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |and the height at each <math style="vertical-align: 0px">x</math> is our density function, <math style="vertical-align: -5px">\rho(x).</math> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Normally <math style="vertical-align: 0px">2\pi R</math> represents once around a circle of radius <math style="vertical-align: -5px">R,</math> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |but in this case we only go half way around. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Therefore, we '''adjust''' our usual shell method formula to find the population as | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| + | <math>\begin{array}{rcl} | ||
| + | \displaystyle{P} & = & \displaystyle{\int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}}\pi R\cdot h\,dx}\\ | ||
| + | &&\\ | ||
| + | & = & \displaystyle{\int_{0}^{7}\pi x\cdot\rho(x)\,dx.} | ||
| + | \end{array}</math> | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;" | {| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;" | ||
!Step 2: | !Step 2: | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Let's plug in the actual formula for density and solve. We have | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| + | <math>\begin{array}{rcl} | ||
| + | \displaystyle{P} & = & \displaystyle{\int_{0}^{7}\pi x\cdot25,000e^{-0.15x}\,dx}\\ | ||
| + | &&\\ | ||
| + | & = & \displaystyle{25,000\pi\int_{0}^{7}xe^{-0.15x}\,dx.} | ||
| + | \end{array}</math> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |To solve this, we need to use integration by parts. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Let <math style="vertical-align: 0px">u=x</math> and <math style="vertical-align: 0px">dv=e^{-0.15x}dx.</math> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Then, <math style="vertical-align: 0px">du=dx</math> and <math style="vertical-align: -14px">v=-{\displaystyle \frac{e^{-0.15x}}{0.15}.}</math> |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Thus, |
| − | + | <math>\begin{array}{rcl} | |
| − | + | \displaystyle{P} & = & \displaystyle{25,000\pi\int_{0}^{7}xe^{-0.15x}\,dx}\\ | |
| − | {| | + | &&\\ |
| − | + | & = & \displaystyle{25,000\pi\left[\left.-\frac{xe^{-0.15x}}{0.15}\right|_{0}^{7}+\int_{0}^{7}\frac{e^{-0.15x}}{0.15}\,dx\right]}\\ | |
| + | &&\\ | ||
| + | & = & \displaystyle{25,000\pi\left[-\frac{xe^{-0.15x}}{0.15}-\frac{e^{-0.15x}}{(0.15)^{2}}\right]_{0}^{7}}\\ | ||
| + | &&\\ | ||
| + | & = & \displaystyle{25,000\pi\left[\left(-\frac{7e^{-1.05}}{0.15}-\frac{e^{-1.05}}{(0.15)^{2}}\right)+\frac{1}{(0.15)^{2}}\right]}\\ | ||
| + | &&\\ | ||
| + | & \approx & 986,556. | ||
| + | \end{array}</math> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |Note that in a calculator-prohibited test, no one would expect the actual numerical answer. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |However, you would likely need the line above it to receive full credit. |
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;" | {| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style = "text-align:left;" | ||
!Final Answer: | !Final Answer: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | <math>{\displaystyle 25,000\pi\left[\left(-\frac{7e^{-1.05}}{0.15}-\frac{e^{-1.05}}{(0.15)^{2}}\right)+\frac{1}{(0.15)^{2}}\right]\ \approx\ 986,556}</math> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
[[009B_Sample_Final_2|'''<u>Return to Sample Exam</u>''']] | [[009B_Sample_Final_2|'''<u>Return to Sample Exam</u>''']] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:05, 26 May 2017
A city bordered on one side by a lake can be approximated by a semicircle of radius 7 miles, whose city center is on the shoreline. As we move away from the center along a radius the population density of the city can be approximated by:
people per square mile. What is the population of the city?
| Foundations: |
|---|
| Many word problems can be confusing, and this is a good example. |
| We know that we are going to integrate over a half-disk of radius 7, but how do we construct the integral? |
| One key could be the expression of our density, |
| where is the distance from the center. |
| Any slice along a radius gives us a cross section. |
| If we were revolving ALL the way around the center, this would be typical solid of revolution, |
| and we could find the volume of revolving the center by the usual shell formula |
| What changes, since we are only doing half of a disk? |
| Also, this particular problem will require integration by parts: |
Solution:
| Step 1: |
|---|
| We can treat this as a solid of revolution, and use the shell method. |
| We are working on a half disk of radius 7, so we can integrate a cross-section where goes from 0 to 7 |
| and the height at each is our density function, |
| Normally represents once around a circle of radius |
| but in this case we only go half way around. |
| Therefore, we adjust our usual shell method formula to find the population as |
|
|
| Step 2: |
|---|
| Let's plug in the actual formula for density and solve. We have |
|
|
| To solve this, we need to use integration by parts. |
| Let and |
| Then, and |
| Thus,
|
| Note that in a calculator-prohibited test, no one would expect the actual numerical answer. |
| However, you would likely need the line above it to receive full credit. |
| Final Answer: |
|---|