3. Let
be a linear map and
a subspace. Show that:
is a subspace of
.
Proof:
|
Suppose . Then . But is a subspace and so . But is linear so that so that . Thus, is closed under vector addition. Now suppose and . Then and since is a subspace, . But again is linear so . This means . Hence is closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore is a subspace of .
|
10. Show that if
and
are subspaces, then
is also a subspace.
Proof:
|
Suppose . Then and . But is a subspace and so . Also is a subspace so . This means . On the other hand . Thus, is closed under vector addition. Now suppose and . Then and . But and are subspaces so and . That means . This means . Hence is closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore is a subspace of .
|
12. Let
be a linear map and consider the graph
(a) Show that
is a subspace.
Proof:
|
Suppose . Then . Here I used the fact that is linear which means . Thus, is closed under vector addition. Now suppose and . Then . Again I used the linearity property to conclude . Hence is closed under scalar multiplication. Therefore is a subspace of .
|
(b) Show that the map
that sends
to
is an isomorphism.
Proof:
|
Call this map . That is . First I will show this map is linear:
and . Thus is linear. Now to show is bijective. If , then so is trivially onto. In fact, we essentially chose to the codomain of our function to just be the image/range of the map to ensure it was onto. Now to show is one-to-one. Suppose . Then . But two ordered pairs are equal if and only if both components are equal. That is, . Thus is one-to-one. Therefore is an isomorphism.
|